Author Topic: CFP: Oh, The Horror--The 1980s - Deadline: 08/01/2017  (Read 1062 times)


  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 20
    • View Profile
    • Home Page
CFP: Oh, The Horror--The 1980s - Deadline: 08/01/2017
« on: July 02, 2017, 07:28:34 PM »
Call for Papers: Oh, The Horror--The 1980s

Deadline for submissions: August 1, 2017
Name of organization: Kevin M. Scott (Albany State University) and Connor M. Scott (Georgia State University)
Contact email:

In the 1980s, a decade significantly known for Ronald Reagan, the Moral Majority, and the ascendance of the corporation as an aesthetic, Hollywood recovered from and reacted to the director-centric 1970s by reasserting studio control over mainstream cinema. With notable exceptions, the films of the 1980s were constructive—supporting a neater and more optimistic view of history and American culture—as opposed to the deconstructive films of the prior decade, challenging and, often, fatalistic. A simple review of Oscar nominees for the 1980s, compared to those of the 1970s, demonstrates that the capitalistic desires of the studios aligned neatly with an increasingly self-congratulatory culture and the fantasy of a return to an earlier, simpler, more conservative, whiter, United States.

By nature, however, the horror genre retains a bleaker view of society. In the 1980s, horror subverted corporate influences more often that other mainstream genres and did so both in covert support and critique of politics and values of the era. Because horror films were (and remain) lower budget productions and, hence, lower risk for studios, filmmakers enjoyed a greater degree of freedom. Some filmmakers used that freedom to reify “Reagan-era values” in violent and bloody ways (through figures like Jason Voorhees, Michael Myers, and other slashers) while others offered dark critiques of the politics of the decade—the anti-militarism of George Romero’s Day of the Dead (1985) or the deconstruction of the nuclear family in Joseph Rubin’s The Stepfather (1987).

The editors are developing a new collection of essays with McFarland Books and seek essays investigating the ways horror films during the 1980s responded to the cultural, social, and governmental politics of the decade. We welcome essays from a variety of critical stances (theoretical, psychological, formal, and so forth), but the volume’s purpose is to explore how horror films functioned as a site of political, cultural, and social engagement and/or critique.

We especially welcome essay proposals that take these approaches:

* Close readings of individual films and their engagement with the politics and culture of the era.
* Studies of particular filmmakers and the development of ongoing critiques or concerns within their films.
* Investigations of particular cultural and political themes (poverty, Barbara Creed’s idea of the “monstrous feminine,” the power of corporations, and so forth) in multiple films.
* The evolution within a subgenre over the decade (the slasher, religious/occult horror, and so forth) and how those changes reflected developments in American society.
* Discussions of how horror filmmakers interacted with the film industry and with American culture on an industry level.

This list is not intended to be complete. Other approaches are welcome. While the horror genre thrived in other countries, this volume is primarily interested in American films, films that were prominent for American moviegoers, and films that addressed American political and cultural concerns. While David Cronenberg’s Videodrome (1983, Canadian) fulfills this role, Dario Argento’s Italian films are less likely to do so. However, the inclusion of discussion of foreign films or films outside the decade in order to contrast “American” films of the 1980s or to highlight American political and/or cultural trends may be productive.

The editors seek essays of about 6,000 words.

The audience for this volume is undergraduates through active scholars, though books on this topic will attract an audience among fans of the genre.

Please submit abstracts of 500 words or less to Kevin M. Scott and Connor M. Scott ( by August 1, 2017. Abstracts should be accompanied by a short biography. Notification of acceptance will be given by August 15, 2017. Completed essays will be expected by December 15, 2017. And please email us if you have any questions.

Below, find a short list of films we would be especially interested in seeing discussed in essays for the volume. The list is certainly not meant to be exclusive, and we welcome any productive discussion of other films.


* Alligator
* Altered States
* Cannibal Holocaust
* Demented
* Friday the 13th
* The Fog
* Maniac
* Motel Hell
* Mother’s Day
* The Watcher in the Woods


* An American Werewolf in London
* The Entity
* The Evil Dead
* Friday the 13th PT 2
* The Fun House
* Graduation Day
* Halloween II
* Hell Night
* The Howling
* The Incubus
* Inseminoid
* My Bloody Valentine
* Night School
* Omen III: The Final Conflict
* Wolfen


* The Aftermath
* Alone in the Dark
* Basket Case
* Cat People
* Creepshow
* Curse of the Cannibal Confederates
* Friday the 13th Part III
* Halloween III: Season of the Witch
* The Last Horror Film
* Poltergeist
* The Thing


* Christine
* Cujo
* Eyes of Fire
* House on Sorority Row
* The Hunger
* Something Wicked This Way Comes
* Videodrome


* C.H.U.D.
* Children of the Corn
* Gremlins
* A Nightmare on Elm Street
* Silent Night, Deadly Night


* Day of the Dead
* Fright Night
* The Hills Have Eyes Part II
* Lifeforce
* A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge
* The Return of the Living Dead


* Aliens
* Class of Nuke 'Em High
* The Fly
* The Hitcher
* Little Shop of Horrors
* The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2


* Dark Tower
* Evil Dead II
* Killing Spree
* The Lost Boys
* Near Dark
* Predator
* Prince of Darkness
* Hellraiser
* Stepfather


* The Blob
* Killer Klowns from Outer Space
* Maniac Cop
* Pumpkinhead


* Dr. Caligari
* A Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child
Michele Brittany